Kyra PAS: Designing Australia’s first FHiR-native Hospital Patient Administration System

A scalable, mobile-enabled foundation for patient flow, interoperability, and hospital-wide coordination.

Why hospitals needed change

Context

Most PAS products in Australian hospitals were antiquated (20+ years old) and difficult to adapt. They were monolithic, siloed across departments and sites, hard to integrate, and often relied on outdated patterns not aligned with modern interoperability standards .

Staff compensated with paper, memory, or duplicate data entry, especially in the Emergency Department where speed and clarity matter most. These gaps created risk across patient safety, accuracy, and system interoperability.

Telstra Health set out to build a modern PAS from the ground up: FHIR native, mobile enabled, cloud hosted, and designed for single-instance deployments across multiple sites to remove fragmentation and standardise workflows.

Problem

Hospitals needed a system that supported:

  • Faster, safer ED administrative capture

  • Clear visibility of patient movement

  • Predictable workflows under pressure

  • Strong alignment with EMR, Bed Management, and downstream systems

  • A modular rollout (no “big bang” switch

  • Modern interoperability (FHIR, SNOMED CT, HL7)

Retrofitting the legacy PAS was unsafe. The structure and terminology of those products were too rigid, hard-coded, and incompatible with FHIR-aligned workflows.

Project Scope

Role
Lead UX Designer

Timeline
6 Months

Company
Telstra Health, Hospitals & Connected Health

Focus
Emergency Department admission pathway for the PAS MVP

Why legacy PAS workflows failed ED operations

Research and insights

Research included interviews with clerical staff, SME consultation, analysis of local PAS products, international review, and mapping of FHIR Patient, Encounter, and Location resources.

Six themes emerged:

  1. Fear of errors
    Staff worried their actions might cause downstream issues.

  2. Cognitive overload
    Legacy screens were dense and spread across multiple locations.

  3. Paper reliance
    Staff used paper to stabilise patient information quickly.

  4. Poor movement visibility
    Whiteboards, spreadsheets, or memory were used to track positions.

  5. Terminology inconsistency
    Every site used slightly different labels and processes.

  6. Integration gaps
    Duplicate data entry across systems created risk and rework.

User frustrations presented with Fiorella, the administrator who wants a simple, intuitive and reliable workflow.

Recurring themes across clerical and clinical staff.

Above are two examples of current PAS used in Australian hospitals

What this meant for design

A new architecture and interface were essential.

Our PAS needed to deliver:

  • A safe and fast ED intake

  • Clear, real-time movement

  • Low cognitive load

  • Consistent terminology

  • Predictable, reversible actions

  • Accurate mapping to FHIR data structures

Defining the ED admission for MVP

Why the emergency dept came first

The Emergency Department is the hospital’s primary entry point. Errors or delays here create flow-on impacts across inpatient, theatre, and bed management operations. By focusing on ED, the team could demonstrate a safe architectural foundation without the risk of trying to cover the entire hospital at once.

PAS user actions across the emergency department of a hospital.

The ED admission path

We modelled the admission process through the lens of Arthur (patient persona) and Fiorella (admin persona).

Critical path:

  • Referral received

  • Quick admit

  • Check or create patient

  • Print armband

  • Send encounter data to EMR

This sequence defined the essential screens and data objects needed to prove the PAS architecture.

Patient persona of Arthur, who we follow on his journey through the emergency department.

Mapping the ED admission process to identify PAS touchpoints and the foundational screens for MVP.

Architecture, strategy, and design

Strategic foundations

Kyra PAS is built on:

  • A single instance PAS model supporting multi-site organisations

  • A Clinical Data Repository (CDR) enabling staged migration from legacy PAS products (no risky big-bang implementation)

  • FHIR-native data structures for clean integration with EMR, Bed Management, Analytics, and Outpatients

  • Common terminologies (SNOMED CT) for semantic consistency across the hospital

  • Cloud hosting in Azure for lower infrastructure overhead and enterprise security

These architectural choices set a modern baseline for future hospital modules: Inpatients, Outpatients, Theatres, Maternity, Waitlist, and Billing.

MVP Architecture:

ED users → Kyra PAS (ED workflows and screens) → FHIR via CDR → EMR and Bed Management → back to ED via updated status.

Architecture of MVP shows that Kyra PAS owns the ED workflows and screens, exchanging FHIR resources through the CDR and surfacing status from EMR and Bed Management back into the ED board.

Design strategy

  • Anchor the PAS around the ED workflow

  • Build a reusable patient card matched to FHIR resources

  • Create a single ED board for flow visibility

  • Keep interactions predictable and consistent

  • Reduce cognitive load through progressive disclosure

  • Mirror the mental model of ED teams

  • Produce a feasible MVP within six months

Wireframe of the PAS showing high level information that needed to be included.

The resulting layout

Designs moved away from the "ugly and confusing" legacy interfaces to a clean, block-based layout.

  • Location board: A grid view representing physical hospital locations (Triage, X-ray, Surgery).

  • Quick actions: A persistent "Quick Admit" button to handle emergency intake without navigating away from the board.

  • Bed availability indicators: Within locations a visual representation of available beds.

  • Patient overview: Selecting a patient card, a slide out drawer with high level editable fields within easy access.

Emergency Department board showing live patient flow, location capacity, and a slide-out patient summary for rapid updates.

Key design decisions

Decision Explanation
Structured arrival flow Captured essential data early, delaying non-critical details to reduce load.
Reusable patient card Modelled on FHIR Patient + Encounter. Supported consistent views across modules.
ED movement board Provided a single high-value surface for tracking patient flow.
Component library Accelerated delivery and ensured consistent UI as modules expanded.
Terminology alignment Ensured the interface matched real-world language.
Status + timer indicators Quick risk identification for exceeded triage wait times.

Component library examples showing buttons and form fields with alternate status states and consistent icon usage for healthcare workflows.

Testing, iteration, and refinement

Validation

Testing included SME walkthroughs, engineering feasibility checks, flow alignment with architect, and iterative prototyping.

Remote walkthrough session with clinicians and the delivery team during the validation phase.

What testing revealed

  • Clinicians needed clearer section delineation to maintain situational awareness.

  • Movement cues required stronger signalling during scroll and collapse events.

  • Navigation patterns needed consistency at both entry and exit points of the workflow.

  • Field grouping and sequence influenced registration accuracy and throughput.

  • Terminology and mandatory fields required configuration for local clinical practice.

Mobile registration flow used in testing. Sessions showed users struggled with long-scroll fields, unclear section boundaries and inconsistent navigation states, which informed refinements to grouping, hierarchy and status indicators.

Key iterations

  • Strengthened hierarchy and section dividers.

  • Added persistent navigation patterns.

  • Refined field grouping for faster completion.

  • Reduced visual noise across form states.

  • Enhanced visibility of required data elements.

Achieving the outcome

How we achieved our aims

We met the goal of designing a modern PAS architecture by:

  • Delivering a FHIR-native MVP that proved the data model

  • Creating a reusable component library for future modules

  • Replacing fragmented screens with a single ED board

  • Using the CDR to support safe migration from legacy PAS products

  • Aligning all workflows with real clinical and clerical needs

  • Structuring ED movement into a clear, intuitive UI

  • Preparing the system for multi-site, multi-module scalability

These advances directly align with Telstra Health’s positioning of Kyra PAS as a single-instance PAS, designed to eliminate siloed workflows and create a consistent user experience across all hospital locations .

National launch showcasing Kyra PAS as a central component of Telstra Health’s next generation health platform.

Launch and stakeholder response

Kyra PAS was introduced at a national launch event that brought together senior clinical, operational and digital health leaders. The showcase positioned PAS as a core component of Telstra Health’s broader Kyra ecosystem and highlighted how a modern, standards-aligned platform supports safer and more connected care.

The response from stakeholders reflected strong sector alignment.

  • Clear demand for a contemporary PAS designed around real clinical workflows.

  • Recognition of the improved ED flow and reduced cognitive burden.

  • Validation of the modular, FHIR-aligned architecture for future expansion.

  • Interest from health services exploring progressive adoption across sites.

  • Early conversations on integration pathways and transition planning.

Reflections

My role

As the sole designer I delivered:

  • Research synthesis

  • ED workflows and UI design

  • Component architecture

  • Prototypes for all ED scenarios

  • Alignment with stakeholders, engineering, and SMEs

  • MVP scope shaping and risk reduction

  • Iteration cycles and decision facilitation

Our first team session in the Adelaide office

Reflection

The compressed timeline and limited access to frontline ED staff required disciplined prioritisation and fast, well-reasoned decisions. Focusing on the ED workflow helped clarify what mattered most and ensured the team delivered a coherent, testable MVP.

Centering the design around clear patterns, reusable components and a stable hierarchy improved the experience for users working under pressure. The work also showed that a modern, interoperable PAS is achievable when technical and design decisions stay tightly aligned.

Kyra PAS now offers a strong base for future modules and extensions, setting a clearer direction for how hospital administration systems can evolve.